Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
Anticancer Res ; 42(10): 4913-4919, 2022 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2056771

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/AIM: SARS-CoV-2 with a dramatical worldwide spread, impacted greatly daily life and healthcare. In order to avoid delay in cancer treatment, many strategies and measures were implemented. The Awake breast surgery was a strategy implemented in our Unit during the pandemic, aimed to reduce operatory room occupancy and increase the number of procedures performed during the daily surgical session. The aim of the study was to evaluate how the use of this strategy has changed before and after the advent of the COVID-19 pandemic, and its relative benefits. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective study analysing all patients subjected to breast conservative surgery for oncological disease from July 2018 to December 2021. RESULTS: Out of 498 patients enrolled in the study, 253 (50.8%) cases were treated before the pandemic and were designated as "pre-COVID-19" group. The remaining 245 (49.1%) cases were considered the "COVID-19" group. Cases of awake surgery in COVID-19 group were 141 (54.7%) vs. 84 (33.2%), p<0.001. Length of hospitalization and surgical time were comparable between the groups: relative p=0.188 and 0.264, respectively. Differently, operation room occupation was significantly shorter in the COVID-19 group, p<0.001; and number of outpatient surgical procedures was higher, p=0.0304. Multivariate analysis identified the period of surgery (OR=1.47) as a statistically significant factor, p=0.011, predictive of prolonged operatory room occupancy. CONCLUSION: Awake surgery was one of the strategies which made more operating rooms available and allowed avoiding further delays.


Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms , COVID-19 , COVID-19/epidemiology , Humans , Pandemics , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Waiting Lists , Wakefulness
2.
In Vivo ; 35(4): 2331-2335, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1285630

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/AIM: Corona virus infection dramatically spread worldwide during 2020 and extraordinary restrictions have been implemented in order to reduce viral transmission. These measures compelled a complete restructuring of the health system, including temporary cancer screening suspension and a significant slow-down in cancer diagnoses and treatments. CASE REPORT: We report five cases of extremely advanced breast cancer referred to our Department amid the COVID-19 pandemic. These patients exhibited a poor prognosis or worse quality of life due to their oncological disease. CONCLUSION: In our opinion, both the slow-down of diagnosis and treatment of oncological disease and anxiety over COVID-19 influenced this presentation. Moreover, other patients were unable to receive palliative care. Hopefully, these cases will not develop into extremely advanced-stage disease, and we will be able to provide at least the necessary palliative care.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , COVID-19 , Anxiety/diagnosis , Anxiety/epidemiology , Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Pandemics , Quality of Life , SARS-CoV-2
3.
Anticancer Res ; 40(12): 7119-7125, 2020 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-962745

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/AIM: Extraordinary restrictions aimed to limit Sars-CoV-2 spreading; they imposed a total reorganization of the health-system. Oncological treatments experienced a significant slowdown. The aim of our multicentric retrospective study was to evaluate screening suspension and surgical treatment delay during COVID-19 and the impact on breast cancer presentation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients who underwent breast surgery from March 11, 2020 to May 30, 2020 were evaluated and considered as the Lockdown group. These patients were compared with similar patients of the previous year, the Pre-Lockdown group. RESULTS: A total of 432 patients were evaluated; n=223 and n=209 in the Lockdown and Pre-lockdown-groups, respectively. At univariate analysis, waiting times, lymph-nodes involvement and cancer grading, showed a statistically significant difference (p<0.05). Multivariate analysis identified waiting-time on list (OR=1.07) as a statistically significant predictive factor of lymph node involvement. CONCLUSION: Although we did not observe a clinically evident difference in breast cancer presentation, we reported an increase in lymph node involvement.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , COVID-19/epidemiology , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2/pathogenicity , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Axilla/pathology , Axilla/surgery , Breast Neoplasms/complications , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Breast Neoplasms/virology , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/virology , Female , Humans , Lymph Node Excision , Lymph Nodes , Lymphatic Metastasis , Mastectomy , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy
4.
In Vivo ; 34(5): 3047-3053, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-740636

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/AIM: Coronavirus disease is spreading worldwide. Due to fast transmission and high fatality rate drastic emergency restrictions were issued. During the lockdown, only urgent medical services are guaranteed. All non-urgent services, as breast cancer (BC) screening, are temporarily suspended. The potential of breast cancer screening programs in increasing the survival rate and decreasing the mortality rate has been widely confirmed. Suspension could lead to worse outcomes for breast cancer patients. Our study aimed to analyse the data and provide estimates regarding the temporary BC screening suspension. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data regarding breast cancer and respective screening programs were achieved through literature research and analysis. RESULTS: Considering three different scenarios with respect to the lockdown's impact on breast cancer screening, we estimate that approximately 10,000 patients could have a missed diagnosis during these 3 months. Considering a 6-month period, as suggested by the Imperial college model, the number of patients who will not receive a diagnosis will rise to 16,000. CONCLUSION: Breast cancer screening should be resumed as soon as possible in order to avoid further breast cancer missed diagnosis and reduce the impact of delayed diagnosis.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Early Detection of Cancer , Mass Screening/trends , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Aged , Betacoronavirus/pathogenicity , Breast Neoplasms/complications , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/complications , Coronavirus Infections/virology , Female , Humans , Mammography , Middle Aged , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/complications , Pneumonia, Viral/virology , SARS-CoV-2
5.
In Vivo ; 34(3 Suppl): 1651-1659, 2020 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-543430

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/AIM: Coronavirus-19 (COVID-19) pandemic outbreak is currently having a huge impact on medical resource allocation. Breast Cancer (BC) patients are concerned both with BC treatment and COVID-19. This study aimed to estimate the impact of anxiety among patients, caused by the spreading of COVID-19. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between the 16th of January and the 20th of March 2020, we retrospectively enrolled 160 patients. Eighty-two patients with a suspected breast lesion (SBL) were divided into two groups: PRE-COVID-19-SBL and POST-COVID-19-SBL. Seventy-eight BC patients were divided into PRE-COVID-19-BC and POST-COVID-19-BC. Patient characteristics including age, marital status, SBL/BC diameter, personal and family history of BC, clinical stage and molecular subtype were recorded. Procedure Refusal (PR) and Surgical Refusal (SR) were also recorded with their reason. RESULTS: BC and SBL analysis showed no difference in pre-treatment characteristics (p>0.05). Both POST-COVID-19-SBL and POST-COVID-19-BC groups showed higher rates of PR and SR (p=0.0208, p=0.0065 respectively). Infection risk represented primary reason for refusal among POST-COVID-19 patients. CONCLUSION: COVID-19-related anxiety could affect patients' decision-making process.


Subject(s)
Anxiety/psychology , Biopsy, Large-Core Needle/psychology , Breast Neoplasms/psychology , Coronavirus Infections/psychology , Decision Making , Elective Surgical Procedures/psychology , Fear/psychology , Mastectomy/psychology , Pneumonia, Viral/psychology , Treatment Refusal/psychology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anxiety/etiology , Attitude to Health , Biopsy, Large-Core Needle/methods , Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , COVID-19 , Female , Humans , Italy , Mammography , Middle Aged , Pandemics , Retrospective Studies , Socioeconomic Factors , Ultrasonography, Mammary , Vacuum
6.
In Vivo ; 34(3 Suppl): 1685-1694, 2020 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-543429

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/AIM: Despite the large amount of clinical data available of Coronavirus-19 (COVID-19), not many studies have been conducted about the psychological toll on Health Care Workers (HCWs). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this multicentric descriptive study, surveys were distributed among 4 different Breast Cancer Centers (BCC). BCCs were distinguished according to COVID-19 tertiary care hospital (COVID/No-COVID) and district prevalence (DP) (High vs. Low). DASS-21 score, PSS score and demographic data (age, sex, work) were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 51 HCWs were analyzed in the study. Age, work and sex did not demonstrate statistically significant values. Statistically significant distribution was found between DASS-21-stress score and COVID/No-COVID (p=0.043). No difference was found in the remaining DASS-21 and PSS scores, dividing the HCWs according to COVID-19-hospital and DP. CONCLUSION: Working in a COVID-19-hospital represents a factor that negatively affects psychosocial well-being. However, DP seems not to affect the psychosocial well-being of BCC HCWs. During the outbreak, psychological support for low risk HCWs should be provided regardless DP.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Cancer Care Facilities , Coronavirus Infections/psychology , Occupational Diseases/prevention & control , Patient Care Team , Personnel, Hospital/psychology , Pneumonia, Viral/psychology , Adult , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/transmission , Depression/epidemiology , Depression/etiology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Occupational Stress/epidemiology , Occupational Stress/etiology , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/transmission , Prevalence , Protective Devices/supply & distribution , Psychosocial Support Systems , Rome , Severity of Illness Index , Tertiary Care Centers , Uncertainty , Workload
7.
In Vivo ; 34(3 Suppl): 1661-1665, 2020 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-531488

ABSTRACT

COVID-19 has been officially declared as a pandemic by the WHO. Italy was the first European country to be strongly affected by this outbreak. All elective and health promotion activities were reduced. Accordingly, Italian Breast Units and breast cancer (BC) screening programs scaled down significantly their activities. The aim of this study was to evaluate measures that could potentially reduce the clinical impact of COVID-19 on BC patients. Temporary recommendations are needed that could assist specialists in preventing COVID-19 infection and optimizing resources for diagnosis and treatment of BC patients.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Coronavirus Infections , Elective Surgical Procedures/psychology , Hospitals, University , Hospitals, Urban , Mastectomy/psychology , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral , Treatment Refusal/psychology , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Breast Neoplasms/psychology , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , COVID-19 , Carcinoma/diagnostic imaging , Carcinoma/psychology , Carcinoma/surgery , Carcinoma/therapy , Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/diagnostic imaging , Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/psychology , Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/surgery , Combined Modality Therapy , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Coronavirus Infections/psychology , Delayed Diagnosis , Disease Management , Early Detection of Cancer , Estrogens , Female , Humans , Mammography , Mass Screening , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Neoplasms, Hormone-Dependent/diagnostic imaging , Neoplasms, Hormone-Dependent/psychology , Neoplasms, Hormone-Dependent/surgery , Neoplasms, Hormone-Dependent/therapy , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/psychology , Rome , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/psychology , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/therapy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL